Malaysian universities have tended to put emphasis on producing large quantities of papers, rather than quality. Many academics are practicing ‘chequebook academia’ by paying to place articles in journals that can publish them within a month or so from submission. The quantity of paper output rather than academic weight is the prime KPI of Malaysian universities today.
See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/what-you-think/article/its-time-to-put-university-research-in-malaysia-under-the-microscope-murray
14 October 2015
09 October 2015
Media Statement 7 October 2015
KENYATAAN
MEDIA 7 OKTOBER 2015
Semalam, 6 Oktober 2015, Dr Azmi Sharom telah gagal
dalam cubaan beliau untuk mendapatkan pengistiharan dari Mahkamah Persekutuan
terhadap ketidakakuran Akta Hasutan dengan Perlembagaan Malaysia. Mahkamah
telah mengistiharkan akta tersebut adalah sah.
Pergerakan Tenaga Akademik Malaysia (GERAK)
terkilan akan keputusan tersebut dan amat bimbang akan kesannya terhadap
kebebasan akademik di Malaysia, terutamanya terhadap kebebasan bersuara. Dengan
pengesahan tersebut, mahkamah telah melanjutkan kegunaan sesutu undang-undang
boleh dan telahpun digunakan untuk menyekat kebebasan akademik.
Azmi telah dituduh dibawah Akta Hasutan kerana
memberi pandangan professional sebagai seorang ahli akademik undang-undang.
Kami sebagai ahli akademik mempunyai satu tanggungjawab untuk berkongsi ilmu
bukan sahaja dengan pelajar dan masyarakat akademik tetapi juga dengan
masyarakat umum. Ini adalah sebahagian dari sumbangan wajib para akademik
kepada masyarakat. Para akademik bukannya robot hanya untuk mengajar dan buat
penyelidikan. Kami perlu menyumbang balik kepada masyarakat atas kebebasan
akademik yang telah diberikan.
Kami, para akademik Malaysia mengesa Peguam Negara
mengkaji semula dan menarik balik pertuduhan terhadap Azmi Sharom. Berikan
ruang kepada kami untuk suara akademik. Kita tidak akan dapat membentukkan
universiti kelas dunia dengan ranking tinggi jika para akademiknya tidak diberi
kebebasan akademik.
Yesterday, 6 October 2015, Dr Azmi Sharom lost
in his attempt to get a declaration from the Federal Court on the
non-constitutionality of the Sedition Act. The court had declared that the act
is valid.
The Malaysian Academics Movement (MOVE) is very
disappointed with the declaration and worried with its effect on academic
freedom in Malaysia, particularly on freedom of academic expression. The
court, by upholding the Sedition Act has in fact allowed for the continuation
of a law that can be and has been used to curb academic freedom.
Azmi was charged under the Sedition
Act for giving his expert opinion as a legal academic. We, as academics have a
responsibility to share our expertise not only with our students and the
academic community but also with the public at large. This is part of our
required contribution to society. Academics are not robots that just do
teaching and research. We must give back to society for giving us academic
freedom.
We, Malaysian academics, urge the Attorney-General
to revise and withdraw the charges against Azmi Sharom. We need room for academic expression. We can never
have high-ranking world class universities without academic freedom.
Bagi pihak GERAK / On behalf of MOVE
Rosli H Mahat
Setiausaha Agung / General Secretary
GERAK / MOVE
06 October 2015
Solidarity with Azmi Sharom
6 Oct 2015: Academics in solidarity with Azmi Sharom at Palace of Justice (Federal Court), Putrajaya
30 September 2015
23 September 2015
Asian Correspondent: The plight of academic freedom in Malaysia
The government is pursuing new reforms and just recently released the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 with much fanfare. However, something conspicuously absent from these proposed reforms is a commitment to academic freedom.
http://asiancorrespondent.com/135569/the-plight-of-academic-freedom-in-malaysia/
http://asiancorrespondent.com/135569/the-plight-of-academic-freedom-in-malaysia/
16 September 2015
Academic revolution demands for open access to knowledge
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/apr/09/frustrated-blogpost-boycott-scientific-journals?CMP=share_btn_fb
The Guardian ........."Academic publishers operate with profit margins of 35% or more, while getting their raw materials and the work of thousands of taxpayer- and charity-funded scientists free.
Academics write the papers, academics referee the papers, academics select the papers that are going to be published – it's almost as though the publisher does nothing that we need except perhaps their organisational role and lending the name of the journal that confers a certain reputation."
The Guardian ........."Academic publishers operate with profit margins of 35% or more, while getting their raw materials and the work of thousands of taxpayer- and charity-funded scientists free.
Academics write the papers, academics referee the papers, academics select the papers that are going to be published – it's almost as though the publisher does nothing that we need except perhaps their organisational role and lending the name of the journal that confers a certain reputation."
15 September 2015
VOX: Liberal college students want to be "coddled".
http://www.vox.com/2015/9/14/9326965/obama-political-correctness
Obama: "The idea that you’d have somebody in government making a decision about what you should think ahead of time or what you should be taught, and if it’s not the right thought, or idea, or perspective or philosophy, that person would be — they wouldn’t get funding, runs contrary to everything we believe about education,"
Obama: "The idea that you’d have somebody in government making a decision about what you should think ahead of time or what you should be taught, and if it’s not the right thought, or idea, or perspective or philosophy, that person would be — they wouldn’t get funding, runs contrary to everything we believe about education,"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

